ahmido
971105daa9
Summary: Upgrade Filament to v5 (Livewire v4), replace Filament v4-only plugins, add first-party JSON renderer, and harden Monitoring/Ops UX guardrails. What I changed: Composer: upgraded filament/filament → v5, removed pepperfm/filament-json and lara-zeus/torch-filament, added torchlight/engine. Views: replaced JSON viewer with json-viewer.blade.php and updated snapshot display. Tests: added DB-only + tenant-isolation guard tests under Monitoring and OpsUx, plus Filament smoke tests. Specs: added/updated specs/057-filament-v5-upgrade/* (spec, tasks, plan, quickstart, research). Formatting: ran Pint; ran full test suite (641 passed, 5 skipped). Validation: Ran ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test (full suite) — all tests passed. Ran ./vendor/bin/sail pint --dirty — formatting applied. Ran npm run build locally (Vite) — assets generated. Notes / Rollback: Rollback: revert composer.json/composer.lock and build assets; documented in quickstart.md. One pending app migration was noted during validation; ensure migrations are applied in staging before deploy. Reviewers: @frontend, @backend (adjust as needed) Spec links: spec.md tasks.md quickstart.md Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@adsmac.local> Reviewed-on: #66
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Admin UI Stack Upgrade (Panel + Suite)
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-01-20
|
|
**Feature**: [specs/057-filament-v5-upgrade/spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- This is a technical upgrade, but the spec intentionally describes outcomes and guardrails rather than implementation steps.
|
|
- Proceed to planning: identify concrete packages, versions, and migration steps in plan/tasks.
|