ahmido
d072b0107b
Implements platform feature branch `302-tenant-owned-surface-route-audit`. Target branch: `platform-dev`. Follow-up integration path after merge: `platform-dev` → `dev`. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #357
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant-Owned Surface Route Audit
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-05-14 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No runtime implementation details are required for the behavior contract; repo surfaces are named only to bound the audit.
- Focused on user value and business needs: a repo-verified repair inventory and follow-up order.
- Written for product, implementation, and review stakeholders.
- All mandatory Spec Kit and constitution sections are completed.
Requirement Completeness
- No
[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]markers remain. - Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
- Success criteria are measurable.
- Success criteria are scoped to the audit artifact and validation evidence.
- All acceptance scenarios are defined.
- Edge cases are identified.
- Scope is clearly bounded to docs/spec artifacts and repo audit.
- Dependencies and assumptions are identified.
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria.
- User scenarios cover inventory, classification, and repair-order flows.
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria.
- No application implementation is hidden inside the specification.
Candidate Selection Gate
- Candidate is explicitly present in
docs/product/spec-candidates.md. - Candidate was directly promoted by the user as
302. - Related Spec 301 is treated as completed context and is not modified.
- Close alternatives are deferred with rationale.
- Scope is a small, reviewable audit/prep slice.
Spec Readiness Notes
- Runtime code changes are explicitly out of scope.
- The later implementation deliverable is expected to be
surface-route-audit.mdinside this spec package. - Any runtime defect discovered during the audit must be documented as a follow-up blocker or candidate, not fixed in this spec.