ahmido
d072b0107b
Implements platform feature branch `302-tenant-owned-surface-route-audit`. Target branch: `platform-dev`. Follow-up integration path after merge: `platform-dev` → `dev`. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #357
45 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
45 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant-Owned Surface Route Audit
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-05-14
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No runtime implementation details are required for the behavior contract; repo surfaces are named only to bound the audit.
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs: a repo-verified repair inventory and follow-up order.
|
|
- [x] Written for product, implementation, and review stakeholders.
|
|
- [x] All mandatory Spec Kit and constitution sections are completed.
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain.
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable.
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are scoped to the audit artifact and validation evidence.
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined.
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified.
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded to docs/spec artifacts and repo audit.
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions are identified.
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria.
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover inventory, classification, and repair-order flows.
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria.
|
|
- [x] No application implementation is hidden inside the specification.
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection Gate
|
|
|
|
- [x] Candidate is explicitly present in `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`.
|
|
- [x] Candidate was directly promoted by the user as `302`.
|
|
- [x] Related Spec 301 is treated as completed context and is not modified.
|
|
- [x] Close alternatives are deferred with rationale.
|
|
- [x] Scope is a small, reviewable audit/prep slice.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Readiness Notes
|
|
|
|
- Runtime code changes are explicitly out of scope.
|
|
- The later implementation deliverable is expected to be `surface-route-audit.md` inside this spec package.
|
|
- Any runtime defect discovered during the audit must be documented as a follow-up blocker or candidate, not fixed in this spec.
|