ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
9e435ea91f
TenantAtlas/specs/342-customer-review-workspace-final-consumption-productization/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido bf10645dc3 feat: finalize customer review workspace consumption (342) (#414) 
## Summary
- finalize the existing Customer Review Workspace as a customer-safe first-screen consumption surface
- lead the page with one review decision card, readiness flow, findings summary, accepted-risk summary, and secondary proof instead of diagnostics-first presentation
- keep evidence, review-pack, export, audit, and operation proof states explicit and separate so the page does not make false readiness or evidence claims
- add focused Spec 342 Feature and Browser coverage plus the spec-local truth map, state contract, and screenshot artifacts
- preserve the existing workspace-wide route with canonical `environment_id` filtering only and no new portal, backend generation flow, or navigation rewrite

## Validation
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/Spec342CustomerReviewWorkspaceConsumptionTest.php tests/Feature/Reviews/CustomerReviewWorkspacePageTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail php vendor/bin/pest tests/Browser/Spec342CustomerReviewWorkspaceConsumptionSmokeTest.php tests/Browser/Reviews/CustomerReviewWorkspaceSmokeTest.php --compact`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `git diff --check`

## Notes
- screenshot artifacts are included under `specs/342-customer-review-workspace-final-consumption-productization/artifacts/screenshots/`
- Livewire v4 compliance unchanged
- Filament provider registration remains in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php`
- no globally searchable resource behavior changed in this slice
- no new destructive action behavior was introduced
- no new Filament assets; deploy `filament:assets` posture is unchanged
- full suite was not run in this turn; validation stayed on the focused Spec 342 slices

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #414
2026-06-01 08:15:11 +00:00

4.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 342 - Customer Review Workspace v1 Final Consumption Productization

Purpose: Validate Spec 342 preparation completeness before implementation.
Created: 2026-06-01
Feature: specs/342-customer-review-workspace-final-consumption-productization/spec.md

Candidate Selection Gate

  • CHK001 The selected candidate is directly user-provided as Spec 342 and maps to customer-review-workspace-v1-completion in docs/product/spec-candidates.md.
  • CHK002 The selected candidate aligns with the top current roadmap sellability priority: Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion.
  • CHK003 No existing specs/342-* package or branch was found before Spec Kit creation.
  • CHK004 Related completed/prepared specs were checked and are context only: 249, 258, 312, 326, 329, 335, 336, 337, 340, and 341.
  • CHK005 Close alternatives are deferred rather than hidden scope: localization, governance inbox, commercial entitlements, provider readiness, and PSA/support handoff.
  • CHK006 The scope is a small final-consumption productization slice on the existing /admin/reviews/workspace surface.

Content Quality

  • CHK007 spec.md defines problem, user value, functional requirements, non-goals, acceptance criteria, success criteria, assumptions, risks, and open questions.
  • CHK008 plan.md lists likely affected repo surfaces and distinguishes implementation touch points from supporting surfaces to inspect.
  • CHK009 tasks.md is ordered into small phases with tests, browser smoke, UI coverage, validation, and explicit non-goals.
  • CHK010 repo-truth-map.md exists and classifies current review/evidence/pack/finding/accepted-risk/audit/operation truth.
  • CHK011 customer-review-consumption-state-contract.md exists and defines derived display states without adding persisted truth.
  • CHK012 No unresolved template placeholders remain in spec.md, plan.md, or tasks.md.

Constitution And Scope

  • CHK013 Spec Candidate Check is filled, scored 11/12, and approved as Core Enterprise.
  • CHK014 Proportionality review is present for the possible page-local presenter/state contract.
  • CHK015 The spec does not introduce new migrations, persisted readiness truth, enum/status family, provider framework, or portal architecture.
  • CHK016 Workspace/environment isolation, deny-as-not-found semantics, and canonical environment_id behavior are explicit.
  • CHK017 UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are completed for an existing strategic customer-facing surface.
  • CHK018 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance, panel provider location, global-search posture, destructive-action rules, asset strategy, and testing plan are explicit.

Plan Quality

  • CHK019 The plan sequences work as repo-truth gate → tests first → state contract/presenter → first-screen productization → RBAC/context → browser smoke → validation.
  • CHK020 The plan states no migrations, env vars, packages, queues, scheduler, storage, Graph scopes, Dokploy, or Filament asset changes are expected.
  • CHK021 The plan requires spec/plan update before any high-impact action, asset registration, backend generation, or persisted truth scope appears.
  • CHK022 Test governance is explicit: confidence + one bounded browser smoke.

Task Quality

  • CHK023 Tasks include concrete file paths and avoid inventing runtime paths beyond likely implementation touch points.
  • CHK024 Tasks include Feature/Livewire tests before UI implementation.
  • CHK025 Tasks include browser states and screenshot artifacts while allowing unreachable states to be documented rather than faked.
  • CHK026 Tasks include UI coverage close-out and final validation commands.
  • CHK027 Tasks explicitly forbid rewriting completed specs or reintroducing /admin/t/legacy query aliases.

Spec Readiness Gate

  • CHK028 spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md exist.
  • CHK029 Required supporting prep artifacts exist: repo-truth-map.md, customer-review-consumption-state-contract.md, and checklists/requirements.md.
  • CHK030 No open question blocks safe implementation; unsupported runtime concepts are explicitly unavailable/deferred.
  • CHK031 The implementation scope is bounded enough for a later implementation loop.
  • CHK032 Result: ready for implementation loop.

Review Outcome

  • CHK033 Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case.
  • CHK034 Workflow outcome: keep.
  • CHK035 Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry Guardrail / Exception / Smoke Coverage.