## Summary - standardize Filament table defaults across resources, relation managers, widgets, custom pages, and picker tables - add shared pagination profiles, calm default column visibility, explicit empty states, and session persistence on designated critical resource lists - complete Spec 125 artifacts, regression tests, and dashboard widget follow-up for lazy loading, sortable columns, and toggleable detail columns ## Verification - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=BaselineCompareNow` - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=TableStandardsBaseline` - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=TableDetailVisibility` - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=FilamentTableRiskExceptions` - full suite run completed: `2017 passed, 10 failed, 8 skipped` - manual browser QA completed on the tenant dashboard for lazy loading, sortable widget columns, toggleable hidden status columns, badges, and pagination ## Known Failures The full suite still has 10 pre-existing failures unrelated to this branch: - `Tests\\Unit\\OpsUx\\SummaryCountsNormalizerTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\BackupWithAssignmentsConsistencyTest` (2 tests) - `Tests\\Feature\\BaselineDriftEngine\\CaptureBaselineContentTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\BaselineDriftEngine\\CompareContentEvidenceTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\BaselineDriftEngine\\ResolverTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\Filament\\TenantDashboardDbOnlyTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\Operations\\ReconcileAdapterRunsJobTrackingTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\ReviewPack\\ReviewPackRbacTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\Verification\\VerificationReportRedactionTest` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #152
1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Filament Table UX Standardization & List Consistency
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-08
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validated after the first full draft; no clarification markers remain.
- The spec names Filament because the product requirement is explicitly about Filament table surfaces, but it avoids code-level method prescriptions and keeps the requirements centered on user-visible behavior.
- The Action Surface Contract is preserved by treating actions as table-local and explicitly out of scope for redesign in this spec.