ahmido
a4f5c4f122
## Summary - standardize Filament table defaults across resources, relation managers, widgets, custom pages, and picker tables - add shared pagination profiles, calm default column visibility, explicit empty states, and session persistence on designated critical resource lists - complete Spec 125 artifacts, regression tests, and dashboard widget follow-up for lazy loading, sortable columns, and toggleable detail columns ## Verification - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=BaselineCompareNow` - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=TableStandardsBaseline` - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=TableDetailVisibility` - `docker exec tenantatlas-laravel.test-1 php artisan test --compact --filter=FilamentTableRiskExceptions` - full suite run completed: `2017 passed, 10 failed, 8 skipped` - manual browser QA completed on the tenant dashboard for lazy loading, sortable widget columns, toggleable hidden status columns, badges, and pagination ## Known Failures The full suite still has 10 pre-existing failures unrelated to this branch: - `Tests\\Unit\\OpsUx\\SummaryCountsNormalizerTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\BackupWithAssignmentsConsistencyTest` (2 tests) - `Tests\\Feature\\BaselineDriftEngine\\CaptureBaselineContentTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\BaselineDriftEngine\\CompareContentEvidenceTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\BaselineDriftEngine\\ResolverTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\Filament\\TenantDashboardDbOnlyTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\Operations\\ReconcileAdapterRunsJobTrackingTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\ReviewPack\\ReviewPackRbacTest` - `Tests\\Feature\\Verification\\VerificationReportRedactionTest` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #152
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Filament Table UX Standardization & List Consistency
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-08
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated after the first full draft; no clarification markers remain.
|
|
- The spec names Filament because the product requirement is explicitly about Filament table surfaces, but it avoids code-level method prescriptions and keeps the requirements centered on user-visible behavior.
|
|
- The Action Surface Contract is preserved by treating actions as table-local and explicitly out of scope for redesign in this spec.
|