TenantAtlas/specs/390-restore-readiness-resolution-adapter-v1/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido c0c3286a80 feat: add restore readiness resolution adapter improvements (#461)
Automated PR created by Codex via Gitea API.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #461
2026-06-20 12:51:12 +00:00

4.4 KiB

Requirements Quality Checklist: Restore Readiness Resolution Adapter v1

Purpose: Validate preparation artifacts before implementation starts. Created: 2026-06-20 Feature: specs/390-restore-readiness-resolution-adapter-v1/spec.md

Candidate Selection

  • Direct user-provided candidate source recorded.
  • Automatic queue status checked and summarized.
  • Deferred alternatives recorded.
  • Completed related specs identified as context only.
  • No completed historical spec was rewritten.
  • Spec number 390 intentionally selected from user draft and adjacent completed context.

Scope Quality

  • Feature goal is clear and operator-facing.
  • Scope, Primary Routes, Data Ownership, and RBAC requirements are explicitly declared.
  • Mode B is selected as the default implementation mode.
  • Generic resolution framework is explicitly out of scope.
  • Adapter registry is explicitly out of scope.
  • Generic persistence is explicitly out of scope.
  • Review-publication resolution persistence reuse is explicitly forbidden.
  • Restore auto-execution from guidance actions is explicitly forbidden.
  • New navigation, dashboard, global search, and notification-center surfaces are explicitly out of scope.

Requirements Completeness

  • User stories cover blocked, ready, persisted, and unauthorized states.
  • Functional requirements are testable.
  • Non-functional requirements are testable.
  • Edge cases include stale basis, unsaved wizard state, execution states, and legacy statuses.
  • Success criteria are measurable.
  • No unresolved blocking clarification is present.
  • Assumptions are documented.

Existing-System Alignment

  • RestoreRun remains the persisted restore record.
  • RestoreSafetyResolver remains the source for checks/preview currentness concepts.
  • Restore Preview remains the preview owner.
  • OperationRun remains execution/evidence truth.
  • Restore Wizard remains the preparation input owner.
  • Existing tenant/workspace/environment scoping is preserved.
  • Existing view/manage capability split is preserved.

UI and Filament Safety

  • Existing Restore create/view surfaces are the only planned UI surfaces.
  • Changed Restore create/view surfaces include UI/UX Surface Classification.
  • Changed Restore create/view surfaces include page contract fields and state ownership.
  • Durable UI/productization coverage update is required because UI impact is material.
  • Decision-first copy requirements are included.
  • Copy must state preparation actions do not execute Restore.
  • Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is recorded in plan.
  • Laravel provider registration location is recorded in plan.
  • Global-search hard rule is recorded in plan and tasks.
  • Destructive-action confirmation rule is recorded in spec, plan, and tasks.
  • Asset strategy and filament:assets deployment condition are recorded.
  • Testing approach for Filament pages/actions is recorded.

Data and Runtime Safety

  • No new migration is planned.
  • No new environment variable is planned.
  • No new queue worker is planned.
  • No scheduled command is planned.
  • No storage/volume change is planned.
  • No Microsoft Graph render-time call is planned.
  • Staging validation requirement is recorded.

Testability

  • Unit test expectations cover readiness derivation.
  • Feature/Filament test expectations cover authorization and UI behavior.
  • Testing/lane/runtime impact includes lane classification, fixture cost, heavy-family decision, budget/trend expectation, and escalation outcome.
  • Query-count budget is measurable and has a validation task.
  • Stale guidance action protection is explicitly tested.
  • Execution confirmation/safety gate preservation is explicitly tested.
  • Browser smoke expectations are recorded for visible UI changes.
  • Validation commands are included.

Implementation Readiness

  • Tasks are dependency-ordered.
  • Contract/spec-package artifacts are required before app code changes.
  • Provider seam classification and OperationRun UX contract reuse are covered.
  • Audit/evidence reuse verification is covered.
  • Stop conditions are explicit.
  • Delivery notes include required Filament output contract items.
  • Tasks avoid marking implementation work complete during preparation.