ahmido
c0c3286a80
Automated PR created by Codex via Gitea API. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #461
93 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
93 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Quality Checklist: Restore Readiness Resolution Adapter v1
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate preparation artifacts before implementation starts.
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-20
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/390-restore-readiness-resolution-adapter-v1/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection
|
|
|
|
- [x] Direct user-provided candidate source recorded.
|
|
- [x] Automatic queue status checked and summarized.
|
|
- [x] Deferred alternatives recorded.
|
|
- [x] Completed related specs identified as context only.
|
|
- [x] No completed historical spec was rewritten.
|
|
- [x] Spec number 390 intentionally selected from user draft and adjacent completed context.
|
|
|
|
## Scope Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] Feature goal is clear and operator-facing.
|
|
- [x] Scope, Primary Routes, Data Ownership, and RBAC requirements are explicitly declared.
|
|
- [x] Mode B is selected as the default implementation mode.
|
|
- [x] Generic resolution framework is explicitly out of scope.
|
|
- [x] Adapter registry is explicitly out of scope.
|
|
- [x] Generic persistence is explicitly out of scope.
|
|
- [x] Review-publication resolution persistence reuse is explicitly forbidden.
|
|
- [x] Restore auto-execution from guidance actions is explicitly forbidden.
|
|
- [x] New navigation, dashboard, global search, and notification-center surfaces are explicitly out of scope.
|
|
|
|
## Requirements Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] User stories cover blocked, ready, persisted, and unauthorized states.
|
|
- [x] Functional requirements are testable.
|
|
- [x] Non-functional requirements are testable.
|
|
- [x] Edge cases include stale basis, unsaved wizard state, execution states, and legacy statuses.
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable.
|
|
- [x] No unresolved blocking clarification is present.
|
|
- [x] Assumptions are documented.
|
|
|
|
## Existing-System Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [x] RestoreRun remains the persisted restore record.
|
|
- [x] RestoreSafetyResolver remains the source for checks/preview currentness concepts.
|
|
- [x] Restore Preview remains the preview owner.
|
|
- [x] OperationRun remains execution/evidence truth.
|
|
- [x] Restore Wizard remains the preparation input owner.
|
|
- [x] Existing tenant/workspace/environment scoping is preserved.
|
|
- [x] Existing view/manage capability split is preserved.
|
|
|
|
## UI and Filament Safety
|
|
|
|
- [x] Existing Restore create/view surfaces are the only planned UI surfaces.
|
|
- [x] Changed Restore create/view surfaces include UI/UX Surface Classification.
|
|
- [x] Changed Restore create/view surfaces include page contract fields and state ownership.
|
|
- [x] Durable UI/productization coverage update is required because UI impact is material.
|
|
- [x] Decision-first copy requirements are included.
|
|
- [x] Copy must state preparation actions do not execute Restore.
|
|
- [x] Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is recorded in plan.
|
|
- [x] Laravel provider registration location is recorded in plan.
|
|
- [x] Global-search hard rule is recorded in plan and tasks.
|
|
- [x] Destructive-action confirmation rule is recorded in spec, plan, and tasks.
|
|
- [x] Asset strategy and `filament:assets` deployment condition are recorded.
|
|
- [x] Testing approach for Filament pages/actions is recorded.
|
|
|
|
## Data and Runtime Safety
|
|
|
|
- [x] No new migration is planned.
|
|
- [x] No new environment variable is planned.
|
|
- [x] No new queue worker is planned.
|
|
- [x] No scheduled command is planned.
|
|
- [x] No storage/volume change is planned.
|
|
- [x] No Microsoft Graph render-time call is planned.
|
|
- [x] Staging validation requirement is recorded.
|
|
|
|
## Testability
|
|
|
|
- [x] Unit test expectations cover readiness derivation.
|
|
- [x] Feature/Filament test expectations cover authorization and UI behavior.
|
|
- [x] Testing/lane/runtime impact includes lane classification, fixture cost, heavy-family decision, budget/trend expectation, and escalation outcome.
|
|
- [x] Query-count budget is measurable and has a validation task.
|
|
- [x] Stale guidance action protection is explicitly tested.
|
|
- [x] Execution confirmation/safety gate preservation is explicitly tested.
|
|
- [x] Browser smoke expectations are recorded for visible UI changes.
|
|
- [x] Validation commands are included.
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] Tasks are dependency-ordered.
|
|
- [x] Contract/spec-package artifacts are required before app code changes.
|
|
- [x] Provider seam classification and OperationRun UX contract reuse are covered.
|
|
- [x] Audit/evidence reuse verification is covered.
|
|
- [x] Stop conditions are explicit.
|
|
- [x] Delivery notes include required Filament output contract items.
|
|
- [x] Tasks avoid marking implementation work complete during preparation.
|