TenantAtlas/specs/244-product-knowledge-contextual-help/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido bf43e55848
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 53s
feat(onboarding): decision-first verify-step & contextual-help callout fix (#282)
This PR implements the onboarding verify-step changes and ProductKnowledge contextual-help fixes:

- Hide the top-level "Permission diagnostics" when a stored verification report exists.
- Move permission details to "Supporting evidence" / "View required permissions" and into stored report technical details.
- Rename "Current checkpoint" to "Step" in onboarding readiness.
- Rename the inner verification card title to "Stored verification details" to avoid duplicate headings.
- Keep "Grant admin consent" as primary CTA when admin consent is the dominant blocker by deriving the CTA from the verification primary reason.
- Replace the custom Safe Next Action with Filament `Callout` for correct dark-mode styling.
- Add/adjust focused feature tests proving the above behaviors.

Verification:
- Tests: 36 passed (173 assertions) locally.
- Pint: pass.

Created from local session branch `244-product-knowledge-contextual-help-session-1777248340`. Please review and merge into `dev` when ready.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #282
2026-04-27 00:09:46 +00:00

2.0 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Product Knowledge & Contextual Help

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to implementation planning
Created: 2026-04-26
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • Business value and operator outcomes stay explicit
  • Implementation anchors are intentional and bounded to existing repo surfaces
  • Runtime-governance sections are present for an implementation-ready spec package
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Acceptance scenarios are defined for the primary user journeys
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded to onboarding and support-diagnostic surface families plus one internal machine-readable knowledge source deliverable
  • Dependencies and assumptions are identified

Feature Readiness

  • The first slice is small enough for a bounded implementation loop
  • The plan identifies the concrete repo surfaces likely to change
  • The tasks are ordered, testable, and grouped by user story
  • No unresolved product question blocks safe implementation of the first slice

Governance Readiness

  • No new persistence is introduced without justification
  • Provider-boundary handling and glossary reuse are explicit
  • Existing RBAC and tenant/workspace isolation remain authoritative
  • Operator-facing surface changes include the required UI contract sections
  • Livewire v4 compliance, unchanged provider registration location, no global-search changes, no destructive-action additions, and no asset-strategy changes are explicit in the package

Notes

  • This checklist completes the implementation-ready package alongside spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md.
  • The active slice stays bounded to one code-owned help catalog, one resolver, two adopted surface families, and one safe machine-readable knowledge source.