ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
d644265d30
TenantAtlas/specs/203-baseline-compare-strategy/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido d644265d30 Spec 203: extract baseline compare strategy (#233) 
## Summary
- extract baseline compare orchestration behind an explicit strategy contract and registry
- preserve the current Intune compare path through a dedicated `IntuneCompareStrategy`
- harden compare launch and review surfaces for mixed, unsupported, incomplete, and strategy-failure truth
- add Spec 203 artifacts, focused regression coverage, and future-domain strategy proof tests

## Testing
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Baselines/CompareStrategyRegistryTest.php tests/Unit/Baselines/CompareSubjectResultContractTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineCompareStrategySelectionTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineComparePreconditionsTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineCompareExecutionGuardTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineCompareMatrixCompareAllActionTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCompareStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareLandingStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareLandingWhyNoFindingsTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareMatrixPageTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/OperationRunBaselineTruthSurfaceTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- no new Filament panel/provider registration changes
- no global-search resource changes
- no new asset registration or deployment step changes

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #233
2026-04-13 21:17:04 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Compare Engine Strategy Extraction

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-13
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated against the draft spec on 2026-04-13 after a wording pass on success criteria to keep them outcome-focused.
  • No clarification markers remain. The spec is ready for /speckit.plan.