ahmido
d644265d30
## Summary - extract baseline compare orchestration behind an explicit strategy contract and registry - preserve the current Intune compare path through a dedicated `IntuneCompareStrategy` - harden compare launch and review surfaces for mixed, unsupported, incomplete, and strategy-failure truth - add Spec 203 artifacts, focused regression coverage, and future-domain strategy proof tests ## Testing - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Baselines/CompareStrategyRegistryTest.php tests/Unit/Baselines/CompareSubjectResultContractTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineCompareStrategySelectionTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineComparePreconditionsTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineCompareExecutionGuardTest.php tests/Feature/Baselines/BaselineCompareMatrixCompareAllActionTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCompareStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareLandingStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareLandingWhyNoFindingsTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareMatrixPageTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/OperationRunBaselineTruthSurfaceTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Notes - no new Filament panel/provider registration changes - no global-search resource changes - no new asset registration or deployment step changes Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #233
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Compare Engine Strategy Extraction
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-13
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated against the draft spec on 2026-04-13 after a wording pass on success criteria to keep them outcome-focused.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain. The spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`.
|