## Summary - implement the canonical shared fixture profile model with minimal, standard, and full semantics plus temporary legacy alias resolution - slim default factory behavior for operation runs, backup sets, provider connections, and provider credentials while keeping explicit heavy opt-in states - migrate the first console, navigation, RBAC, and drift caller packs to explicit lean helpers and wire lane comparison reporting into the existing Spec 206 seams - reconcile spec 207 docs, contracts, quickstart guidance, and task tracking with the implemented behavior ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Support/CreateUserWithTenantProfilesTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/TenantFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/OperationRunFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/BackupSetFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/ProviderConnectionFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/ProviderCredentialFactoryTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/FixtureCostProfilesGuardTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/FixtureLaneImpactBudgetTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/TestLaneArtifactsContractTest.php tests/Feature/Console/ReconcileOperationRunsCommandTest.php tests/Feature/Console/ReconcileBackupScheduleOperationRunsCommandTest.php tests/Feature/Navigation/RelatedNavigationResolverMemoizationTest.php tests/Feature/Spec080WorkspaceManagedTenantAdminMigrationTest.php tests/Feature/BaselineDriftEngine/FindingFidelityTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `./scripts/platform-test-lane fast-feedback` - `./scripts/platform-test-lane confidence` - `./scripts/platform-test-report fast-feedback` - `./scripts/platform-test-report confidence` ## Lane outcome - `fast-feedback`: 136.400761s vs 176.73623s baseline, status `improved` - `confidence`: 394.5669s vs 394.383441s baseline, status `stable` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #240
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Shared Test Fixture Slimming
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-16
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation pass completed after removing leftover template content from the initial scaffold.
- No clarification markers or placeholder sections remain in the spec.
- The spec is ready for
/speckit.plan.