ahmido
d8e331e92f
## Summary - implement the canonical shared fixture profile model with minimal, standard, and full semantics plus temporary legacy alias resolution - slim default factory behavior for operation runs, backup sets, provider connections, and provider credentials while keeping explicit heavy opt-in states - migrate the first console, navigation, RBAC, and drift caller packs to explicit lean helpers and wire lane comparison reporting into the existing Spec 206 seams - reconcile spec 207 docs, contracts, quickstart guidance, and task tracking with the implemented behavior ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Support/CreateUserWithTenantProfilesTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/TenantFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/OperationRunFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/BackupSetFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/ProviderConnectionFactoryTest.php tests/Unit/Factories/ProviderCredentialFactoryTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/FixtureCostProfilesGuardTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/FixtureLaneImpactBudgetTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/TestLaneArtifactsContractTest.php tests/Feature/Console/ReconcileOperationRunsCommandTest.php tests/Feature/Console/ReconcileBackupScheduleOperationRunsCommandTest.php tests/Feature/Navigation/RelatedNavigationResolverMemoizationTest.php tests/Feature/Spec080WorkspaceManagedTenantAdminMigrationTest.php tests/Feature/BaselineDriftEngine/FindingFidelityTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `./scripts/platform-test-lane fast-feedback` - `./scripts/platform-test-lane confidence` - `./scripts/platform-test-report fast-feedback` - `./scripts/platform-test-report confidence` ## Lane outcome - `fast-feedback`: 136.400761s vs 176.73623s baseline, status `improved` - `confidence`: 394.5669s vs 394.383441s baseline, status `stable` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #240
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Shared Test Fixture Slimming
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-16
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed after removing leftover template content from the initial scaffold.
|
|
- No clarification markers or placeholder sections remain in the spec.
|
|
- The spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`. |