TenantAtlas/specs/198-monitoring-page-state/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido e02799b383 feat: implement spec 198 monitoring page state contract (#238)
## Summary
- implement Spec 198 monitoring page-state contracts across Operations, Audit Log, Finding Exceptions Queue, Evidence Overview, Baseline Compare Landing, and Baseline Compare Matrix
- align selected-record and draft/apply behavior with query/session restoration semantics, including canonical navigation and tenant-filter normalization helpers
- add Spec 198 feature and browser coverage, update closure/spec artifacts, and refresh affected regression tests that asserted pre-contract behavior

## Verification
- focused Spec 198 feature pack passed through Sail
- Spec 198 browser smoke passed through Sail
- existing Spec 190 and Spec 194 browser smokes passed through Sail
- targeted fallout tests were updated and rerun during full-suite triage

## Notes
- Livewire v4 / Filament v5 compliant only; no legacy API reintroduction
- no provider registration changes; Laravel 11+ provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php`
- no global-search behavior changed for any resource
- destructive queue decision actions remain confirmation-gated and authorization-backed
- no new Filament assets were added; existing deploy step for `php artisan filament:assets` remains unchanged

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #238
2026-04-15 21:59:42 +00:00

1.5 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Monitoring Page-State Contract

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-15 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed on 2026-04-15.
  • Route identifiers, page class paths, and operator action labels are included because the repository template and constitution require explicit scope, action-surface, and page-contract definitions for operator-facing changes.
  • The spec intentionally introduces a bounded monitoring page-state taxonomy while rejecting a global shell refactor, a runtime state framework, and any forced flattening of Compare Matrix.