## Summary - implement Spec 198 monitoring page-state contracts across Operations, Audit Log, Finding Exceptions Queue, Evidence Overview, Baseline Compare Landing, and Baseline Compare Matrix - align selected-record and draft/apply behavior with query/session restoration semantics, including canonical navigation and tenant-filter normalization helpers - add Spec 198 feature and browser coverage, update closure/spec artifacts, and refresh affected regression tests that asserted pre-contract behavior ## Verification - focused Spec 198 feature pack passed through Sail - Spec 198 browser smoke passed through Sail - existing Spec 190 and Spec 194 browser smokes passed through Sail - targeted fallout tests were updated and rerun during full-suite triage ## Notes - Livewire v4 / Filament v5 compliant only; no legacy API reintroduction - no provider registration changes; Laravel 11+ provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - no global-search behavior changed for any resource - destructive queue decision actions remain confirmation-gated and authorization-backed - no new Filament assets were added; existing deploy step for `php artisan filament:assets` remains unchanged Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #238
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Monitoring Page-State Contract
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-15
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed on 2026-04-15.
|
|
- Route identifiers, page class paths, and operator action labels are included because the repository template and constitution require explicit scope, action-surface, and page-contract definitions for operator-facing changes.
|
|
- The spec intentionally introduces a bounded monitoring page-state taxonomy while rejecting a global shell refactor, a runtime state framework, and any forced flattening of Compare Matrix. |