TenantAtlas/specs/247-plans-entitlements-billing-readiness/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Plans, Entitlements & Billing Readiness

Purpose: Validate full preparation-package completeness and implementation readiness after planning and task generation
Created: 2026-04-27
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• Business value and operator outcomes stay explicit
• The first slice is bounded to one workspace plan profile, two entitlement keys, two first enforcement points, and one read-only system summary
• Runtime-governance sections are present for a future runtime feature, not treated as docs-only
• All mandatory sections are completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Acceptance scenarios are defined for the primary user journeys
• Edge cases are identified, including over-limit workspaces, existing artifacts, and unchanged queued runs
• Scope is clearly bounded away from checkout, invoices, payment providers, proration, trials, grace periods, and a customer-account domain
• Dependencies, assumptions, risks, and follow-up candidates are identified

Feature Readiness

• The first slice is small enough for bounded later planning
• Concrete repo surfaces are named for settings, onboarding, review-pack generation, and system visibility
• Follow-up commercial work is separated from the current slice instead of hidden inside it
• No unresolved product question blocks /speckit.implement once artifact analysis passes
• The selected candidate remains recognizable while the implementation slice stays narrow

Governance Readiness

• Workspace-owned settings are explicitly chosen over a new billing/account persistence model
• Capability-first RBAC and 404 versus 403 semantics remain explicit
• Entitlement denials are separated from RBAC denials and described as truthful product-state blocks
• System-plane visibility is read-only and auditable in the first slice
• Operator-facing surfaces include the required UI contract sections and action matrix
• Livewire v4 compliance, unchanged provider registration location, no global-search changes, confirmation expectations for destructive actions, and no asset-strategy changes are explicit in the package

Test Governance Review

• Lane fit stays in focused unit plus feature validation only
• Fixture and helper growth stays local to workspace, tenant, review-pack, and platform-directory contexts
• No browser or heavy-governance family is introduced implicitly
• Minimal validation commands are explicit in the spec
• Runtime impact is treated as a real future feature, not as a documentation-only update

Review Outcome

• Review outcome class: keep
• Workflow outcome: keep
• Next command readiness: /speckit.implement after analyze issues are cleared

Notes

• This checklist now validates the full preparation package: spec, plan, supporting design artifacts, and tasks. It does not imply that application code already exists.
• The first slice intentionally stops before trial or grace lifecycle state, payment integration, broader plan matrices, or any customer-account domain.
• System-plane mutation is deferred on purpose; the first slice keeps system visibility read-only to avoid creating a second commercial source of truth.
• Implementation close-out note (2026-04-27): the bounded slice has now been implemented and the focused validation lanes completed. The final post-format review-pack and system-directory lane passed at 31 passed (133 assertions).
• Browser smoke close-out note (2026-04-27): an integrated-browser smoke attempt was made because the slice changed user-facing Filament surfaces, but the environment could not provide a reliable authenticated tenant/system panel context. The smoke result is therefore classified as environment-blocked rather than pass/fail.
• Shared-surface note (2026-04-27): the final proof for blocked review-pack actions relies on the shared operator-facing tooltip helper text plus disabled action state. Direct tooltip-object inspection on the wrapped recordless Filament header action was not stable enough to serve as the final regression check.