ahmido
e222845a36
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 53s
Automated commit and PR created by Copilot per user request. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #287
61 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
61 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Plans, Entitlements & Billing Readiness
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate full preparation-package completeness and implementation readiness after planning and task generation
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-27
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] Business value and operator outcomes stay explicit
|
|
- [x] The first slice is bounded to one workspace plan profile, two entitlement keys, two first enforcement points, and one read-only system summary
|
|
- [x] Runtime-governance sections are present for a future runtime feature, not treated as docs-only
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections are completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Acceptance scenarios are defined for the primary user journeys
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified, including over-limit workspaces, existing artifacts, and unchanged queued runs
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded away from checkout, invoices, payment providers, proration, trials, grace periods, and a customer-account domain
|
|
- [x] Dependencies, assumptions, risks, and follow-up candidates are identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] The first slice is small enough for bounded later planning
|
|
- [x] Concrete repo surfaces are named for settings, onboarding, review-pack generation, and system visibility
|
|
- [x] Follow-up commercial work is separated from the current slice instead of hidden inside it
|
|
- [x] No unresolved product question blocks `/speckit.implement` once artifact analysis passes
|
|
- [x] The selected candidate remains recognizable while the implementation slice stays narrow
|
|
|
|
## Governance Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] Workspace-owned settings are explicitly chosen over a new billing/account persistence model
|
|
- [x] Capability-first RBAC and 404 versus 403 semantics remain explicit
|
|
- [x] Entitlement denials are separated from RBAC denials and described as truthful product-state blocks
|
|
- [x] System-plane visibility is read-only and auditable in the first slice
|
|
- [x] Operator-facing surfaces include the required UI contract sections and action matrix
|
|
- [x] Livewire v4 compliance, unchanged provider registration location, no global-search changes, confirmation expectations for destructive actions, and no asset-strategy changes are explicit in the package
|
|
|
|
## Test Governance Review
|
|
|
|
- [x] Lane fit stays in focused unit plus feature validation only
|
|
- [x] Fixture and helper growth stays local to workspace, tenant, review-pack, and platform-directory contexts
|
|
- [x] No browser or heavy-governance family is introduced implicitly
|
|
- [x] Minimal validation commands are explicit in the spec
|
|
- [x] Runtime impact is treated as a real future feature, not as a documentation-only update
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] Review outcome class: `keep`
|
|
- [x] Workflow outcome: `keep`
|
|
- [x] Next command readiness: `/speckit.implement` after analyze issues are cleared
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- This checklist now validates the full preparation package: spec, plan, supporting design artifacts, and tasks. It does not imply that application code already exists.
|
|
- The first slice intentionally stops before trial or grace lifecycle state, payment integration, broader plan matrices, or any customer-account domain.
|
|
- System-plane mutation is deferred on purpose; the first slice keeps system visibility read-only to avoid creating a second commercial source of truth.
|
|
- Implementation close-out note (2026-04-27): the bounded slice has now been implemented and the focused validation lanes completed. The final post-format review-pack and system-directory lane passed at `31 passed (133 assertions)`.
|
|
- Browser smoke close-out note (2026-04-27): an integrated-browser smoke attempt was made because the slice changed user-facing Filament surfaces, but the environment could not provide a reliable authenticated tenant/system panel context. The smoke result is therefore classified as environment-blocked rather than pass/fail.
|
|
- Shared-surface note (2026-04-27): the final proof for blocked review-pack actions relies on the shared operator-facing tooltip helper text plus disabled action state. Direct tooltip-object inspection on the wrapped recordless Filament header action was not stable enough to serve as the final regression check. |