ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
fdfb781144
TenantAtlas/specs/115-baseline-operability-alerts/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido fdfb781144 feat(115): baseline operability + alerts (#140) 
Implements Spec 115 (Baseline Operability & Alert Integration).

Key changes
- Baseline compare: safe auto-close of stale baseline findings (gated on successful/complete compares)
- Baseline alerts: `baseline_high_drift` + `baseline_compare_failed` with dedupe/cooldown semantics
- Workspace settings: baseline severity mapping + minimum severity threshold + auto-close toggle
- Baseline Compare UX: shared stats layer + landing/widget consistency

Notes
- Livewire v4 / Filament v5 compatible.
- Destructive-like actions require confirmation (no new destructive actions added here).

Tests
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Baselines/ tests/Feature/Alerts/`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #140
2026-03-01 02:26:47 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Operability & Alert Integration

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-02-28
Feature: specs/115-baseline-operability-alerts/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation complete.
  • The spec intentionally references internal platform concepts (capability registry, operation runs, admin UI action surfaces) because they are required by the repository’s constitution; it does not prescribe languages, external APIs, or framework implementation steps.