ahmido
fdfb781144
Implements Spec 115 (Baseline Operability & Alert Integration). Key changes - Baseline compare: safe auto-close of stale baseline findings (gated on successful/complete compares) - Baseline alerts: `baseline_high_drift` + `baseline_compare_failed` with dedupe/cooldown semantics - Workspace settings: baseline severity mapping + minimum severity threshold + auto-close toggle - Baseline Compare UX: shared stats layer + landing/widget consistency Notes - Livewire v4 / Filament v5 compatible. - Destructive-like actions require confirmation (no new destructive actions added here). Tests - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Baselines/ tests/Feature/Alerts/` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #140
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Operability & Alert Integration
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
||
**Created**: 2026-02-28
|
||
**Feature**: [specs/115-baseline-operability-alerts/spec.md](../spec.md)
|
||
|
||
## Content Quality
|
||
|
||
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
||
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
||
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
||
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
||
|
||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||
|
||
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
||
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
||
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
||
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
||
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
||
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
||
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
||
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
||
|
||
## Feature Readiness
|
||
|
||
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
||
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
||
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
||
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
||
|
||
## Notes
|
||
|
||
- Validation complete.
|
||
- The spec intentionally references internal platform concepts (capability registry, operation runs, admin UI action surfaces) because they are required by the repository’s constitution; it does not prescribe languages, external APIs, or framework implementation steps. |