ahmido/tenantpilot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
41e80b6c0c
tenantpilot/specs/006-intune-reverse-engineering-guide/checklists/requirements.md
Ahmed Darrazi 41e80b6c0c
All checks were successful
Trigger Cloudarix Deploy / call-webhook (push) Successful in 2s
Details
feat(policy-explorer-v2): implement MVP Phase 1-3 
✨ New Features
- Advanced data table with TanStack Table v8 + Server Actions
- Server-side pagination (10/25/50/100 rows per page)
- Multi-column sorting with visual indicators
- Column management (show/hide, resize) persisted to localStorage
- URL state synchronization for shareable filtered views
- Sticky header with compact/comfortable density modes

📦 Components Added
- PolicyTableV2.tsx - Main table with TanStack integration
- PolicyTableColumns.tsx - 7 column definitions with sorting
- PolicyTablePagination.tsx - Pagination controls
- PolicyTableToolbar.tsx - Density toggle + column visibility menu
- ColumnVisibilityMenu.tsx - Show/hide columns dropdown

🔧 Hooks Added
- usePolicyTable.ts - TanStack Table initialization
- useURLState.ts - URL query param sync with nuqs
- useTablePreferences.ts - localStorage persistence

🎨 Server Actions Updated
- getPolicySettingsV2 - Pagination + sorting + filtering + Zod validation
- exportPolicySettingsCSV - Server-side CSV generation (max 5000 rows)

📚 Documentation Added
- Intune Migration Guide (1400+ lines) - Reverse engineering strategy
- Intune Reference Version tracking
- Tasks completed: 22/62 (Phase 1-3)

✅ Zero TypeScript compilation errors
✅ All MVP success criteria met (pagination, sorting, column management)
✅ Ready for Phase 4-7 (filtering, export, detail view, polish)

Refs: specs/004-policy-explorer-v2/tasks.md
2025-12-10 00:18:05 +01:00

7.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Technical Standard - Intune Reverse Engineering Strategy

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2025-12-09
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • [✓] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • [✓] Focused on user value and business needs
  • [✓] Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • [✓] All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • [✓] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • [✓] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • [✓] Success criteria are measurable
  • [✓] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • [✓] All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • [✓] Edge cases are identified
  • [✓] Scope is clearly bounded
  • [✓] Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • [✓] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • [✓] User scenarios cover primary flows
  • [✓] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • [✓] No implementation details leak into specification

Validation Summary

Status: ✅ PASSED

All checklist items have been validated successfully:

Content Quality Analysis

  • ✅ The spec focuses on WHAT developers need (reverse engineering process) without specifying HOW to build the documentation system
  • ✅ User stories describe developer workflows and business outcomes (reduced onboarding time, fewer bugs)
  • ✅ Language is accessible - explains concepts like "PowerShell reference module" and "API endpoint pattern"
  • ✅ All 3 mandatory sections present: User Scenarios & Testing, Requirements, Success Criteria

Requirement Completeness Analysis

  • ✅ Zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers in the spec
  • ✅ All 8 functional requirements (FR-001 to FR-008) are testable: can verify if documentation includes each specified element
  • ✅ All 6 success criteria (SC-001 to SC-006) have numeric targets: 2 hours, 95% accuracy, 50% reduction, etc.
  • ✅ Success criteria avoid implementation details (e.g., "developer can implement" not "TypeScript code compiles")
  • ✅ Each user story includes 2-3 acceptance scenarios with Given/When/Then format
  • ✅ Edge cases section covers 4 scenarios: PowerShell updates, deprecated features, missing references, quirky behaviors
  • ✅ Scope is bounded: focuses on reverse engineering strategy, not the actual implementation of sync jobs
  • ✅ Dependencies documented: requires IntuneManagement-master/ directory as reference source (FR-002)

Feature Readiness Analysis

  • ✅ All functional requirements map to user story acceptance scenarios:
    • FR-001 (step-by-step process) → User Story 1 Scenario 1
    • FR-003 (data points to extract) → User Story 1 Scenario 2
    • FR-005 (troubleshooting section) → User Story 2 Scenarios
    • FR-007 (versioning strategy) → Edge Case 1
  • ✅ User stories cover complete workflow: implementation (P1) → troubleshooting (P2) → knowledge transfer (P3)
  • ✅ Success criteria align with user outcomes: SC-001 (time savings) validates User Story 1, SC-004 (onboarding) validates User Story 3
  • ✅ No implementation leakage detected (e.g., doesn't specify markdown vs wiki vs code comments for documentation format)

Notes

This specification is ready for /speckit.plan or implementation. No further clarifications or revisions needed.

Next Steps:

  1. ✅ Implementation complete - all tasks executed
  2. ✅ All 8 functional requirements validated in guide
  3. ✅ Guide published at docs/architecture/intune-migration-guide.md

Implementation Validation (2025-12-09)

Functional Requirements Validation

FR-001: Step-by-step process ✅

  • Section "Step-by-Step Implementation Process" includes 6-phase workflow
  • Each phase has concrete actions (e.g., "Find the Graph API call", "Look for property deletions")

FR-002: PowerShell reference location ✅

  • Section "PowerShell Reference Location" specifies reference/IntuneManagement-master/
  • Lists key directories: Modules/, Extensions/, Core.psm1
  • Provides search examples for finding modules

FR-003: Data points to extract ✅

  • Section "Data Points to Extract" has comprehensive checklist
  • Required: endpoints, query parameters ($filter, $expand, $select), property cleanup, type transformations
  • Optional: nested objects, conditional logic, batch operations

FR-004: Concrete examples ✅

  • 4 detailed examples in "Concrete Examples" section
  • Example 1: Windows Update Rings (full implementation)
  • Example 2: Settings Catalog ($expand discovery)
  • Example 3: Invoke-MSGraphRequest translation patterns
  • Example 4: Property cleanup patterns
  • Plus: Complete end-to-end example (Compliance Policies)

FR-005: Troubleshooting section ✅

  • Section "Troubleshooting API Discrepancies" with 8-point checklist
  • Example 1: Missing $expand parameter causing incomplete data
  • Example 2: 400 Bad Request due to wrong API version

FR-006: Fallback process ✅

  • Section "Fallback Process for Missing PowerShell Reference"
  • 5-step process: Check docs → Use Graph Explorer → Extensive testing (2 tenants, 5 resources) → Document assumptions → Monitor for updates

FR-007: Versioning strategy ✅

  • Section "Versioning Strategy" documents commit tracking
  • Example comment format showing PowerShell reference version
  • Process for updating when PowerShell changes

FR-008: Replicate vs document behaviors ✅

  • Section "PowerShell Quirks vs Intentional Patterns"
  • Decision framework: What to replicate (property cleanup, $expand, API versions)
  • What not to replicate (PowerShell-specific syntax, Windows paths)
  • Marking convention: // [POWERSHELL QUIRK]: <description>

Success Criteria Achievability

SC-001: 2-hour implementation time ✅

  • Guide provides step-by-step process reducing discovery time
  • Concrete examples accelerate pattern recognition
  • Expected to reduce 8-hour trial-and-error to 2 hours

SC-002: 95% first-attempt accuracy ✅

  • Comprehensive data extraction checklist prevents missing parameters
  • Troubleshooting section catches common mistakes
  • Validation process ensures correctness

SC-003: Zero API surprises ✅

  • PowerShell analysis discovers undocumented behaviors upfront
  • Examples show hidden requirements (e.g., $expand=settings)

SC-004: 30-minute onboarding ✅

  • "Understanding Existing Implementation Patterns" section explains rationale
  • FAQ addresses common questions
  • Real-world examples provide context

SC-005: 50% code review reduction ✅

  • Reviewers can verify against PowerShell reference
  • Version comments enable quick validation
  • Standardized patterns reduce questions

SC-006: Zero "why beta API?" questions ✅

  • "When to Use Beta vs V1.0 API" section documents decision process
  • Examples show PowerShell reference as source of truth

Coverage Summary

  • ✅ All 8 functional requirements fully implemented
  • ✅ All 6 success criteria supported by guide content
  • ✅ All 4 edge cases documented with processes
  • ✅ 3 user stories covered (US1: implementation, US2: troubleshooting, US3: onboarding)
  • ✅ Guide is 1,400+ lines with comprehensive examples and patterns