41e80b6c0c
All checks were successful
Trigger Cloudarix Deploy / call-webhook (push) Successful in 2s
✨ New Features - Advanced data table with TanStack Table v8 + Server Actions - Server-side pagination (10/25/50/100 rows per page) - Multi-column sorting with visual indicators - Column management (show/hide, resize) persisted to localStorage - URL state synchronization for shareable filtered views - Sticky header with compact/comfortable density modes 📦 Components Added - PolicyTableV2.tsx - Main table with TanStack integration - PolicyTableColumns.tsx - 7 column definitions with sorting - PolicyTablePagination.tsx - Pagination controls - PolicyTableToolbar.tsx - Density toggle + column visibility menu - ColumnVisibilityMenu.tsx - Show/hide columns dropdown 🔧 Hooks Added - usePolicyTable.ts - TanStack Table initialization - useURLState.ts - URL query param sync with nuqs - useTablePreferences.ts - localStorage persistence 🎨 Server Actions Updated - getPolicySettingsV2 - Pagination + sorting + filtering + Zod validation - exportPolicySettingsCSV - Server-side CSV generation (max 5000 rows) 📚 Documentation Added - Intune Migration Guide (1400+ lines) - Reverse engineering strategy - Intune Reference Version tracking - Tasks completed: 22/62 (Phase 1-3) ✅ Zero TypeScript compilation errors ✅ All MVP success criteria met (pagination, sorting, column management) ✅ Ready for Phase 4-7 (filtering, export, detail view, polish) Refs: specs/004-policy-explorer-v2/tasks.md
158 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
158 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Technical Standard - Intune Reverse Engineering Strategy
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2025-12-09
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [✓] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [✓] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [✓] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [✓] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [✓] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [✓] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [✓] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [✓] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [✓] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [✓] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [✓] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [✓] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [✓] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [✓] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [✓] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [✓] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Validation Summary
|
|
|
|
**Status**: ✅ PASSED
|
|
|
|
All checklist items have been validated successfully:
|
|
|
|
### Content Quality Analysis
|
|
- ✅ The spec focuses on WHAT developers need (reverse engineering process) without specifying HOW to build the documentation system
|
|
- ✅ User stories describe developer workflows and business outcomes (reduced onboarding time, fewer bugs)
|
|
- ✅ Language is accessible - explains concepts like "PowerShell reference module" and "API endpoint pattern"
|
|
- ✅ All 3 mandatory sections present: User Scenarios & Testing, Requirements, Success Criteria
|
|
|
|
### Requirement Completeness Analysis
|
|
- ✅ Zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers in the spec
|
|
- ✅ All 8 functional requirements (FR-001 to FR-008) are testable: can verify if documentation includes each specified element
|
|
- ✅ All 6 success criteria (SC-001 to SC-006) have numeric targets: 2 hours, 95% accuracy, 50% reduction, etc.
|
|
- ✅ Success criteria avoid implementation details (e.g., "developer can implement" not "TypeScript code compiles")
|
|
- ✅ Each user story includes 2-3 acceptance scenarios with Given/When/Then format
|
|
- ✅ Edge cases section covers 4 scenarios: PowerShell updates, deprecated features, missing references, quirky behaviors
|
|
- ✅ Scope is bounded: focuses on reverse engineering strategy, not the actual implementation of sync jobs
|
|
- ✅ Dependencies documented: requires `IntuneManagement-master/` directory as reference source (FR-002)
|
|
|
|
### Feature Readiness Analysis
|
|
- ✅ All functional requirements map to user story acceptance scenarios:
|
|
- FR-001 (step-by-step process) → User Story 1 Scenario 1
|
|
- FR-003 (data points to extract) → User Story 1 Scenario 2
|
|
- FR-005 (troubleshooting section) → User Story 2 Scenarios
|
|
- FR-007 (versioning strategy) → Edge Case 1
|
|
- ✅ User stories cover complete workflow: implementation (P1) → troubleshooting (P2) → knowledge transfer (P3)
|
|
- ✅ Success criteria align with user outcomes: SC-001 (time savings) validates User Story 1, SC-004 (onboarding) validates User Story 3
|
|
- ✅ No implementation leakage detected (e.g., doesn't specify markdown vs wiki vs code comments for documentation format)
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
This specification is ready for `/speckit.plan` or implementation. No further clarifications or revisions needed.
|
|
|
|
**Next Steps**:
|
|
1. ✅ Implementation complete - all tasks executed
|
|
2. ✅ All 8 functional requirements validated in guide
|
|
3. ✅ Guide published at `docs/architecture/intune-migration-guide.md`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Validation (2025-12-09)
|
|
|
|
### Functional Requirements Validation
|
|
|
|
**FR-001**: Step-by-step process ✅
|
|
- Section "Step-by-Step Implementation Process" includes 6-phase workflow
|
|
- Each phase has concrete actions (e.g., "Find the Graph API call", "Look for property deletions")
|
|
|
|
**FR-002**: PowerShell reference location ✅
|
|
- Section "PowerShell Reference Location" specifies `reference/IntuneManagement-master/`
|
|
- Lists key directories: Modules/, Extensions/, Core.psm1
|
|
- Provides search examples for finding modules
|
|
|
|
**FR-003**: Data points to extract ✅
|
|
- Section "Data Points to Extract" has comprehensive checklist
|
|
- Required: endpoints, query parameters ($filter, $expand, $select), property cleanup, type transformations
|
|
- Optional: nested objects, conditional logic, batch operations
|
|
|
|
**FR-004**: Concrete examples ✅
|
|
- 4 detailed examples in "Concrete Examples" section
|
|
- Example 1: Windows Update Rings (full implementation)
|
|
- Example 2: Settings Catalog ($expand discovery)
|
|
- Example 3: Invoke-MSGraphRequest translation patterns
|
|
- Example 4: Property cleanup patterns
|
|
- Plus: Complete end-to-end example (Compliance Policies)
|
|
|
|
**FR-005**: Troubleshooting section ✅
|
|
- Section "Troubleshooting API Discrepancies" with 8-point checklist
|
|
- Example 1: Missing $expand parameter causing incomplete data
|
|
- Example 2: 400 Bad Request due to wrong API version
|
|
|
|
**FR-006**: Fallback process ✅
|
|
- Section "Fallback Process for Missing PowerShell Reference"
|
|
- 5-step process: Check docs → Use Graph Explorer → Extensive testing (2 tenants, 5 resources) → Document assumptions → Monitor for updates
|
|
|
|
**FR-007**: Versioning strategy ✅
|
|
- Section "Versioning Strategy" documents commit tracking
|
|
- Example comment format showing PowerShell reference version
|
|
- Process for updating when PowerShell changes
|
|
|
|
**FR-008**: Replicate vs document behaviors ✅
|
|
- Section "PowerShell Quirks vs Intentional Patterns"
|
|
- Decision framework: What to replicate (property cleanup, $expand, API versions)
|
|
- What not to replicate (PowerShell-specific syntax, Windows paths)
|
|
- Marking convention: `// [POWERSHELL QUIRK]: <description>`
|
|
|
|
### Success Criteria Achievability
|
|
|
|
**SC-001**: 2-hour implementation time ✅
|
|
- Guide provides step-by-step process reducing discovery time
|
|
- Concrete examples accelerate pattern recognition
|
|
- Expected to reduce 8-hour trial-and-error to 2 hours
|
|
|
|
**SC-002**: 95% first-attempt accuracy ✅
|
|
- Comprehensive data extraction checklist prevents missing parameters
|
|
- Troubleshooting section catches common mistakes
|
|
- Validation process ensures correctness
|
|
|
|
**SC-003**: Zero API surprises ✅
|
|
- PowerShell analysis discovers undocumented behaviors upfront
|
|
- Examples show hidden requirements (e.g., $expand=settings)
|
|
|
|
**SC-004**: 30-minute onboarding ✅
|
|
- "Understanding Existing Implementation Patterns" section explains rationale
|
|
- FAQ addresses common questions
|
|
- Real-world examples provide context
|
|
|
|
**SC-005**: 50% code review reduction ✅
|
|
- Reviewers can verify against PowerShell reference
|
|
- Version comments enable quick validation
|
|
- Standardized patterns reduce questions
|
|
|
|
**SC-006**: Zero "why beta API?" questions ✅
|
|
- "When to Use Beta vs V1.0 API" section documents decision process
|
|
- Examples show PowerShell reference as source of truth
|
|
|
|
### Coverage Summary
|
|
|
|
- ✅ All 8 functional requirements fully implemented
|
|
- ✅ All 6 success criteria supported by guide content
|
|
- ✅ All 4 edge cases documented with processes
|
|
- ✅ 3 user stories covered (US1: implementation, US2: troubleshooting, US3: onboarding)
|
|
- ✅ Guide is 1,400+ lines with comprehensive examples and patterns
|