TenantAtlas/specs/151-findings-workflow-backstop/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido ec71c2d4e7 feat: harden findings workflow and audit backstop (#181)
## Summary
- harden finding lifecycle changes behind the canonical `FindingWorkflowService` gateway
- route automated resolve and reopen flows through the same audited workflow path
- tighten tenant and workspace scope checks on finding actions and audit visibility
- add focused spec artifacts, workflow regression coverage, automation coverage, and audit visibility tests
- update legacy finding model tests to use the workflow service after direct lifecycle mutators were removed

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- focused findings and audit slices passed during implementation
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Models/FindingResolvedTest.php`
- full repository suite passed: `2757 passed`, `8 skipped`, `14448 assertions`

## Notes
- Livewire v4.0+ compliance preserved
- no new Filament assets or panel providers introduced; provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php`
- findings stay on existing Filament action surfaces, with destructive actions still confirmation-gated
- no global search behavior was changed for findings resources

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #181
2026-03-18 12:57:23 +00:00

1.3 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Findings Workflow Enforcement and Audit Backstop

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-18
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass complete. The spec intentionally extends Spec 111 and Spec 134 without redefining findings statuses, findings capabilities, or the broader audit UI contract.