ahmido
ec71c2d4e7
## Summary - harden finding lifecycle changes behind the canonical `FindingWorkflowService` gateway - route automated resolve and reopen flows through the same audited workflow path - tighten tenant and workspace scope checks on finding actions and audit visibility - add focused spec artifacts, workflow regression coverage, automation coverage, and audit visibility tests - update legacy finding model tests to use the workflow service after direct lifecycle mutators were removed ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - focused findings and audit slices passed during implementation - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Models/FindingResolvedTest.php` - full repository suite passed: `2757 passed`, `8 skipped`, `14448 assertions` ## Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance preserved - no new Filament assets or panel providers introduced; provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - findings stay on existing Filament action surfaces, with destructive actions still confirmation-gated - no global search behavior was changed for findings resources Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #181
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Findings Workflow Enforcement and Audit Backstop
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-18
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/specs/151-findings-workflow-backstop/spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass complete. The spec intentionally extends Spec 111 and Spec 134 without redefining findings statuses, findings capabilities, or the broader audit UI contract. |