ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
742d65f0d9
TenantAtlas/specs/230-findings-notification-convergence/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 742d65f0d9
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 51s
Details
feat: converge findings notification presentation (#265) 
## Summary
- converge finding, queued, and completed database notifications on one shared `OperationUxPresenter` presentation contract
- preserve existing finding and operation deep-link authorities while standardizing title, body, status/icon treatment, and single primary action
- add focused notification, findings, and guard coverage plus the full feature 230 spec artifacts

## Validation
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Notifications/SharedDatabaseNotificationContractTest.php tests/Feature/Notifications/OperationRunNotificationTest.php tests/Feature/Notifications/FindingNotificationLinkTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsNotificationEventTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsNotificationRoutingTest.php tests/Feature/OpsUx/Constitution/LegacyNotificationGuardTest.php`

## Filament / Platform Notes
- Livewire v4.0+ compliance preserved on Filament v5 primitives
- provider registration remains unchanged in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php`
- no globally searchable resource behavior changed in this feature
- no destructive actions were introduced
- asset strategy is unchanged; the existing `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` deploy step remains sufficient

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #265
2026-04-22 20:26:18 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Findings Notification Presentation Convergence

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-22
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Repo-mandatory cross-cutting and validation sections reference current shared paths and test entry points, but the feature scope, user scenarios, requirements, and success criteria stay implementation-agnostic.
  • No open clarification markers remain. The candidate is ready for /speckit.plan.