ahmido
742d65f0d9
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 51s
## Summary - converge finding, queued, and completed database notifications on one shared `OperationUxPresenter` presentation contract - preserve existing finding and operation deep-link authorities while standardizing title, body, status/icon treatment, and single primary action - add focused notification, findings, and guard coverage plus the full feature 230 spec artifacts ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Notifications/SharedDatabaseNotificationContractTest.php tests/Feature/Notifications/OperationRunNotificationTest.php tests/Feature/Notifications/FindingNotificationLinkTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsNotificationEventTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsNotificationRoutingTest.php tests/Feature/OpsUx/Constitution/LegacyNotificationGuardTest.php` ## Filament / Platform Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance preserved on Filament v5 primitives - provider registration remains unchanged in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - no globally searchable resource behavior changed in this feature - no destructive actions were introduced - asset strategy is unchanged; the existing `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` deploy step remains sufficient Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #265
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Findings Notification Presentation Convergence
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-22
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Repo-mandatory cross-cutting and validation sections reference current shared paths and test entry points, but the feature scope, user scenarios, requirements, and success criteria stay implementation-agnostic.
|
|
- No open clarification markers remain. The candidate is ready for `/speckit.plan`.
|